Cookie Preferences

    We use cookies for analytics and to identify companies visiting our site (not individuals). Essential cookies are always active. Learn more

    For AI & Security Leaders

    Secure Your AI Program
    Before Your Adversaries Do.

    ZIVIS combines CISO-level advisory with hands-on adversarial testing to help you secure your AI program — across people, process, and technology.

    Proof in the Results
    A growing AI company needed to demonstrate their security posture to pass a Fortune 500 security review — with clearance to touch customer data. ZIVIS ran adversarial testing, provided continuous platform coverage, and advised through every step of the process. Pilot approved in under four weeks. Now advancing through full sub-processor assessment with ongoing ZIVIS support.

    Third-party pen test reports. Signed compliance artifacts published directly to the buyer's portal. NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SOC 2, OWASP LLM Top 10. And when the buyer's security team wanted a call — our senior leadership showed up.

    The Problem

    Your AI Program Has Security Gaps You Haven't Found Yet

    Most AI programs are built for speed — not security. Governance frameworks check boxes, but they don't simulate real attacks. The gaps in your AI security posture aren't theoretical. They're the ones adversaries will find first.

    48%

    of enterprise security pros identify agentic AI as the most dangerous attack vector

    77%

    of organizations have experienced AI-related security incidents in the past year

    5%

    of AI Centers of Excellence have embedded adversarial security testing into their operating model

    AI Centers of Excellence focus on adoption and governance — but rarely embed adversarial testing into their security posture. The result? Programs that look secure on paper but haven't been tested against real threats.

    Why AI Programs Are Vulnerable

    The gap isn't governance — it's adversarial testing. Here's what separates secure AI programs from ones that only look secure.

    What Most Organizations Do

    • Governance frameworks without adversarial testing create false confidence
    • Traditional pen tests don't cover AI-specific attack vectors
    • Internal teams lack the expertise to simulate real AI threats
    • Point-in-time audits can't keep pace with model updates and new capabilities

    What ZIVIS Does Differently

    • Scenario-based AI attack testing — 120+ adversarial scenarios
    • Real exploit validation, not theoretical risk assessments
    • Continuous verification that updates every time you deploy
    • Advisory that spans people, process, and technology — not just tooling

    Find Out Where You Stand — Before Your Adversaries Do

    Tell us about your AI program. We'll show you exactly what an attacker would find — and how to fix it.

    How It Works

    Security That Protects Your AI Program — People, Process, and Technology

    Third-party pen test reports, signed evidence, continuous adversarial test logs, and security leaders who speak the language of boards, regulators, and stakeholders — this is what a real AI security posture looks like.

    Hands-On Pen Testing & Adversarial Red Teaming

    Jake Miller personally leads offensive security engagements — pen testing, adversarial red teaming, and AI-specific attack simulations. 120+ scenarios including language-switching, prompt injection, and conflicting goal exploitation.

    Seasoned Security Leaders at the Table

    When your board, stakeholders, or partners need answers, our team shows up — not a junior consultant. 35+ years of combined enterprise security leadership including FBI Cybercrime Task Force, Salesforce, and Purdue experience.

    Evidence That Stands Up to Scrutiny

    Signed compliance artifacts, third-party pen test reports, and continuous adversarial test logs — ready for board reporting, regulatory review, or stakeholder assurance.

    Your Advisory & Testing Team
    Jake Miller
    Jake Miller
    CEO & Offensive Security Lead
    Leads pen testing, adversarial red teaming,
    and security consulting. 25+ year veteran.
    Jim Goldman
    Jim Goldman
    vCISO
    FBI Cybercrime Task Force, Purdue,
    Salesforce First VP Global Security GRC

    Jake runs your offensive security engagements and advises directly with your team. When your board or stakeholders need answers, our senior leadership shows up — not a junior consultant.

    7 Autonomous Agents. Always Running.

    Not point-in-time. Continuous coverage that updates every time you ship.

    Recon

    Maps your full AI attack surface before adversaries do.

    Pen Test

    AI-native penetration testing with third-party reports.

    Threat Model

    Auto-generates STRIDE threat models from your architecture.

    Red Team

    120+ adversarial scenarios: prompt injection, goal hijacking, language-switching.

    Trust

    346 evidence-based controls across SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act.

    Monitor

    Continuous coverage that updates every time you ship.

    Evidence

    Publishes signed artifacts for stakeholder and compliance reporting.

    SOC 2ISO 27001ISO 42001NIST AI RMFEU AI ActOWASP LLM Top 10
    The Process

    Secure Your AI Program End to End

    Two tracks running in parallel — offensive security testing and governance advisory. Not a one-time audit. An ongoing cycle that evolves with your AI program.

    Technical Track— Red teaming, pen testing, threat modeling
    Governance Track— Advisory, exercises, stakeholder prep
    01

    Assess Your AI Attack Surface

    Technical

    Map your AI attack surface — exposed endpoints, model access patterns, data flows, architecture review for adversarial risk vectors

    Governance

    Evaluate your current AI governance posture, identify gaps across people, process, and technology, build the remediation roadmap

    02

    Red Team, Pen Test & Threat Model

    Technical

    120+ adversarial scenarios — prompt injection, goal hijacking, data exfiltration. Full pen testing with third-party reports. STRIDE threat models generated from your architecture.

    Governance

    Tabletop exercises with your leadership team, build risk registers, prepare executive-ready security narratives for board and stakeholders

    03

    Report, Remediate & Harden

    Technical

    Deliver findings reports, prioritized remediation guidance, and re-test after fixes. Pen test reports and red team results packaged for compliance and stakeholder review.

    Governance

    Map findings to your framework requirements (NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act), prep risk walkthroughs, assemble evidence packages

    04

    Continuous Security Posture

    Technical

    Threat models, third-party pen test reports, and red team results continuously updated as your AI program evolves

    Governance

    ZIVIS senior leadership — with over 60 years of combined experience — provides ongoing advisory. Board reporting, regulatory preparation, and stakeholder assurance built in.

    Then We Do It Again

    Every time you deploy a new model, onboard a new AI capability, or expand your AI program — we re-run adversarial testing, update threat models, and refresh your evidence. This isn't a point-in-time report. It's continuous security coverage that scales with your AI program.

    Priority onboarding available for organizations with active AI security concerns.

    Don't Wait for an AI Security Incident to Act

    Tell us about your AI program and we'll show you where the gaps are.

    We typically respond within 24 hours.